I found the article defending the
advancement of BIM Processing tools quite interesting for the future of Concept
to Construction in Integrated Practice. BIM programs offer new strategies to
strengthen the language gaps from architect to client, where old methods of
drawings are replaced with comprehensible web based designs and virtual walk through
of proposed projects. Machine readability will revolutionize the industry both
for clients as well as architects. As of now, architects are now being required
to demonstrate the knowledge of tectonics of the structure, where the buildings
mechanics,( hvac, electrical, plumbing, sprinklers) are to be located, support
varied analyses, and most detailed , support for fabrication, and the timeframe
in which it will be carried on. Through BIM, all this is possible. BIM allows
users to develop parametric models where a proposed space is given a level of
refinement, analyses, and detailing which simply is not possible within
standard design practice.
Through BIM programs like Revit,
coordination between different building trades becomes much simpler than it is
currently. Where in old practice, architectural drawings can be vague, on site
inspections were mandatory. With Revit, the amount of layering the program
offers, clears up any questions because all the proposed information for
construction is there. Because of this, the logistics of scheduling, cost
estimation and productivity gap between contractors and sub-contractors,
deliveries, and construction and manufacturing can greatly be reduced.
I find BIM to be an incredible tool
to work with, because it allows designers to know while they are designing that
their forms can be fabricated for its desired application. For me, graduating
with a B.S. in Architecture has still left a lot of holes of knowledge
regarding construction and the realities in design. Working with these programs
will force me to understand with a greater knowledge what is required in the
construction process, and the tectonics that go behind how things are made.
Another interesting fact i read
pertained to architectural firms in desperate need of personnel who are
compatible with BIM software. These programs need developing for new parametric
objects for future applications, in order to grow with the industry. Energy,
lighting, air flow, and mechanical equipment simulations requires much more
development in BIM. Firms such as Frank Gehry and Norman Foster have been firms
who have invested in this program to advance in the field of architecture for
the future of design. I believe it to be responsible for all firms to put at
least one foot in the door and not have their backs turned to what could
revolutionize the field of Architecture.
Lastly, I find the quote "BIM knowledge
should be controlled by the profession, not by the software companies" to
be intriguing. It is our responsibility as growing architects to stay up to
date with software, coding, rules etc. to protect our importance in this field.
Through BIM, architects can advance the knowledge and capabilities supporting
design and construction.
